Audio Script Competition

by Bob Tinsley

As you may have noticed, TVWriter™ has been generously allowing me space from time to time to enthuse about the opportunities for writers in the Audio Drama field. Pursuant to that – and before LB decides to pull the plug – here’s something I think everybody who comes here should know:

The Audio Drama Production Podcast is holding a competition for new audio drama scripts. The bare bones are these:

They will be accepting scripts in any genre except fan fiction in three categories: 10-minute, 15-minute, and 30-minute scripts. For those of you unfamiliar with audio scripts a decent rule of thumb is 165 to 185 words of finished script to one minute of run time.

The submission window runs from January 8 to the 21st.  The links to the place to pay and upload scripts will be posted on the website and FaceBook page on January 8. (see below)

The winning scripts will be performed live at The Vault Festival in London on March 7 and at the Edinburgh Podfest in August. The other scripts will be placed in a repository from which 20 producers will choose scripts they like to produce and distribute on the Interwebs.

The submission fee is $6 for up to three scripts.

Don’t worry too much about format. Celtix and, I believe, Final Draft have templates for audio (radio) plays. There are two accepted formats: one is the old radio format, also known as BBC format. Most dedicated voice actors that I have talked to prefer this format. Sample scripts and a Word and Wordclone compatible template can be downloaded from

http://www.ruyasonic.com/rdr_main.htm

The other format is the standard screenplay format. Most high-budget audio productions, such as Bronzeville with Laurence Fishburne and Homecoming with David Schwimmer, use this format because most of their actors are either film or TV actors.

The most important thing to remember is to pitch the action toward audible rather than visual cues. “John grabbed Mary and shook her,” doesn’t translate well to audio. “John grabbed Mary and shook her ’til her teeth rattled and her cheeks flapped like a dog with its head out the window of a speeding car,” on the other hand, does.

The audio drama field is growing by leaps and bounds, creating opportunities for those of us willing to give it a try. Even if you don’t win this competition, having your script chosen for production afterward will provide a nice hard-point on your resume.

All the details of the competition can be found on the Audio Drama Production Podcast website at http://audiodramaproduction.com/2017/12/adpp-audio-drama-script-writing-competition-2018/

The Audio Drama field is particularly nice because of its low cost of entry, but the nicest part about the Audio Drama community of producers and actors is how welcoming and helpful they all are. Give them half an excuse to choose your script, and they will.

So, get to writing, and be ready to submit starting January 8, 2018. You’ve got nothing to lose other than your unproduced status.

Bob Tinsley: Adventures in Audio Drama – 4

Chapter 4
by Bob Tinsley

ShadowLa Cosa Nostra

“This Thing of Ours”, what do we call it?

What we call it affects the public’s perception of it, and perception affects acceptance and popularity.

This HUGE question was mentioned in Fred Greenhalgh and FinalRune Productions’s hangout, The Future of Audio Drama Panel. Everyone interested in audio drama should watch it. In spite of the technical challenges it was very informative and a lot of fun. It should, I hope, be the first in a series. An hour just isn’t enough to cover all the things that an ambitious title like that demands. Thanks, Fred.

But I digress.

Audio Drama. The first thing everyone focuses on when hearing those two words is radio drama. The impression those last two words leaves is: poor production values, awkward writing, bad acting. All that in spite of Suspense, Inner Sanctum, Gunsmoke, Mercury Theatre, etc.

That impression, that PERCEPTION, is helping to keep “This Thing of Ours” in the entertainment ghetto in my humble opinion.

Tell someone you are going to play an audio drama for them. Immediately you see their eyes lose focus; their lips lift in a sneer; they start making excuses (whining!).

But if you can press-gang them into actually listening to an episode of We’re Alive! or The Cleansed or The Leviathan Chronicles or any of the myriad of other quality shows out there, their face lights up, and they say, “Oh. I didn’t know it was like that.”

But if they were out there in the wilds of the interwebs alone and given a choice between “audio drama” or “audiobook” where do you think they would go?

Yeah, me, too.

So, what do we call it?

“Theatre of the Mind” is a good phrase, but does it still carry the same connotation in the mind of Joe Onthestreet that it did in the Golden Age of Radio when it was coined? Not to me. It seems kinda clunky. Too many words.

Theater, though, does have a certain cachet.

One suggestion that came up during the hangout Panel from Claire Eden, producer of Minister of Chance, was “sonic movie”. At first blush, not bad.

What is a movie? Images that move accompanied by meaningful sound, both of which occur outside the spectator (remember that word).

A good audio drama will generate images behind the listener’s eyes while the sound continues outside. The spectator becomes a participant.

“Movie” can work. I think.

But, “sonic movie”? Sounds kinda like a weapon, he said, pulling a sonic blaster out of his pocket.

“Mind movie”? I like that better, even if I did think it up myself (actually it occurred in the Wall Street Journal back in 2010).

But . . .

There’s that “movie” word again with the implication that everything is occurring external to the audience, an audience made up of spectators.

Then there’s “audio theater”. Many actors have said that they love theater because they can hear and/or see the audience reaction, implying that the audience affects their acting. From that I can infer that the theater audience is, in some way, a participant in the performance.

So, maybe, “audio theater” isn’t such a bad choice, audience as participant.

Is that the best name? I don’t know. I do know we need a good, spiffy, sexy name that runs trippingly off the tongue. It could be one of the biggest things we need to pull audio dra. . . erm . . . theater out of the ghetto.