LB: You Think the New Fantastic Four Movie is bad?

old ff Captureby Larry Brody

If  you think the FANTASTIC FOUR reboot that opened last weekend sucked, I won’t argue. But I will say that you shoulda seen this one.

I mean it. You really should see this one because as messed up as it is, this never-released Roger Corman produced cheapo from 1994 still has something that none of the later movie attempts, including the most recent, have ever had.



Respect for the source.

Enjoy, True Believers:

About LB

Larry Brody has been profiled in such national magazines and websites as Esquire, Entertainment Weekly, Starlog, People, Electronic Media, IndieSlate, TechTV, io9, and of course TV Guide. A legendary figure in the television writing and production world, with a career going back to the late ’60s, Brody has written and produced literally thousands of hours of network and syndicated television. Brody has also been active in the TV animation world, writing, creating, consulting, and/or supervising the cult favorite STAR TREK animated TV series, the SILVER SURFER, SPAWN, SUPERMAN, SPIDERMAN, and SPIDER-MAN UNLIMITED animated series, and was showrunner of the French animated series, DIABOLIK, as well as part of the team that developed and wrote the live-action/cgi animation sci-fi series Ace Lightning for the BBC. Shows written or produced by Brody have won several awards including - yes, it's true - Emmys.

2 thoughts on “LB: You Think the New Fantastic Four Movie is bad?

  1. Rreed423 says:

    That was kinda fun. The same script with better effects could have played in theaters. Dr. Doom was actually a little scary, even if he leaned a little too much on the evil laugh. The three Fox FF movies watered him down and made him boring. (I haven’t seen the third, the new one, but I read a complete outline of it.) The Corman movie got the characters right, and the guy in the Thing suit wasn’t bad, though Michael Chiklis was the best part of the first two Fox movies.

  2. Rreed423 says:

    If anybody saw this and wonders why the very wide screen image stretches the people out, I will explain. If the movie had ever been shown in theaters a lens on the projector would have made the image not quite as wide and the people would have looked normal.

Comments are closed.