Not Everyone is Thrilled About COMMUNITY’s Renewal

Opinions. Everybody’s got ‘em. To us, they seem a lot like Sam Goldwyn’s opinion of verbal contracts: “They’re not worth the paper they’re printed on.”

Wonder what Dan Harmon thinks. Anyway:

Chevy Chase AKA the evil one

Community is renewed, so why am I not flipping-out happy?
by Keith McDuffee

This past season of ‘Community’ was not a shining example of what I’d come to love for three seasons. Will the show’s renewal bring with it the Dan Harmon-like fun it used to have?

The answer to that last question is: probably not.

I know there are a lot of die-hard Community fans out there who believe their beloved show can do no wrong. We have a few at CliqueClack HQ, in fact; I’ve seen the sub-Reddit dedicated to the show too. The fact of the matter is, this season sucked — at least in comparison to previous seasons — and unless it decides to make a significant shift in its writing style, I’m out next season.

What happened to stand-out episodes like the first Halloween episodes? The first paintball episode? Advanced Dungeons and Dragons? The blanket/pillow fort war? What do these all have in common? They didn’t happen in season four. Can you name any that even come close to these gems from season four? I didn’t think so.

Read it all

 

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter+1Pin it on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg ThisSubmit to reddit

License Fees & Mega-Deals are the Best Revenge

This isn’t about writing per se, but it is about intellectual property and its use and/or misuse. Or, as some people put it, “All hail Kim Dotcom, King of the World!”

Us? Yeah, well, we’re still on the fence.

why-need-img-1

Kim Dotcom to Google, Twitter, Facebook: I Own Security Patent, Work With Me
by Andy

Kim Dotcom has announced that he is the inventor of the so-called two-step authentication system and has a patent to prove it. The Megaupload founder says the security mechanism, which has just been introduced by Twitter, is being used by U.S. companies more than a billion times every week without permission. Dotcom says he doesn’t want to sue, but might if the likes of Google and Facebook don’t help fund his legal battle with the U.S. Government.

While the United States Government paints Kim Dotcom as some kind of international super criminal, the Megaupload founder sees himself rather differently.

Continually over the past year and half, and particularly since his January 2012 arrest in New Zealand, the German-born entrepreneur has described himself as an innovator, someone who creates rather than destroys as the U.S. would have people believe.

Dotcom’s achievements are many and his cloud storage companies past and present have certainly generated hundreds of headlines. However, it seems that the New Zealand resident’s creative mind was already working overtime more than 15 years ago to come up with an idea that is now gaining serious traction online.

Two-step authentication is a system designed to prevent unauthorized access to online accounts. If a user logs into a service from an unusual device or location, the service sends a message containing a password to a trusted device such as a cellphone. This enables the service to authenticate the access and allow the log in.

Just hours ago Twitter implemented the system but it’s already in use by companies such as Google and Facebook.

In fact, according to Kim Dotcom there are more than a billion uses of the system every single week and he’s got good reason to be interested. The businessman says he invented it, and to back up his claim he’s just posted his patent to Twitter…

Read it all

UPDATE: This just in from IPCopy:

Kim [Dotcom] does indeed hold US patent US6078908 which is directed to two-factor authentication…[But] A look at the EPO register for the equivalent European patent reveals that the European patent was granted, but subsequently opposed and then revoked in its entirety in 2011.

The key prior art document in the opposition was EP0745961, owned by AT&T, with an earlier priority date of 31 May 1995. Interestingly, AT&T’s US equivalent US5708422 is granted, and still appears to be in force.

Read it all

Stay tuned. Or not. (Yeah, we probably won’t either. But we do think all this wrangling is kinda fun.)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter+1Pin it on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg ThisSubmit to reddit

What? There’s a LOONEY TUNES SHOW?

We didn’t know! We’ve got to see! But before we start searching, we also want to share what we just learned:

daffy

The Looney Tunes Show – Cartoons for Adults
by An Nicholson

WB’s ‘The Looney Tunes Show’ isn’t your childhood ‘Merry Melodies.’ It’s more a grown-up version of ‘Tiny Toons’ geared to the pop-culture-oriented adult.

There’s a difference between the old school Looney Tunes cartoons and Cartoon Network’sLooney Tunes Show. Although the old school WB cartoons focused on a child audience, with a secondary layer for adults, the new school Looney Tunes Show focuses on savvy adults while including comic pratfalls to entertain the elementary aged viewer. Basically, these contemporary cartoons are geared towards former Saturday morning watchers who want cartoons they can watch with their kids while the old school Merry Melodies were geared towards our younger selves with elements our parents could appreciate.

Cartoon Network’s Looney Tunes Show clearly targets an older audience while maintaining slapstick for the younger crowd. If you haven’t caught an episode, Bugs and Daffy are adult male roommates, a la Bert and Ernie, who handle dating while snarking on contemporary society. In the “Black Widow,” Daffy takes a spring vacation while Bugs recreates a 1930s mystery with his girlfriend, Lola. Is it like the original Tex Avery/Chuck Jones cartoons? No. The Looney Tunes Show is closer to its mid-90s WB cartoon siblings who used pop culture to comment on contemporary society for a more aware adult audience. There’s a great opening moment when…

Read it all

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter+1Pin it on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg ThisSubmit to reddit

Angelo J. Bell: Balancing LIFE in the creative world

neo-noir-small-croppedby Angelo J. Bell

Life in the creative world is fraught with instances of friends  family and strangers telling you, “It can’t be done” or “The odds are against you.” Although I’m sure they exist, I don’t know of any artist who ever thought that the odds were in his/her favor. Instead, we, as creatives, merely acquiesce to fate/destiny and to the notion that we will never be happy doing anything else.

Even trying — and failing — is better than abandoning our hopes and dreams….our love affair, with the arts. Just ask any bitter person who long ago abandoned their childlike dreams.

The point then is not, how do we fight the naysayers and negative ninnies, the point is: accepting the full spectrum of our existence in the creative world. Yes, we should build a team of supporters, cheerleaders and motivators. But we must embrace the ups and downs, the highs and lows, the crowds and the solitude. Ultimately we must embrace that fact quite often we must take the first steps towards our goal alone, and in an unfamiliar territory. But isn’t that what has beckoned us into this realm of creativity from the start?

Whether you create worlds with words, perform, give life with 1?s and 0?s, or perceive life with celluloid, our most prized possession, our sword and our shield, is our love for what we do.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter+1Pin it on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUponDigg ThisSubmit to reddit